If you’ve ever read the collection of poems by Shel Silverstein, Where the Sidewalk Ends, then the phrase “complete streets” might remind you of the image above from the cover of his book.
Complete Streets are streets “designed and operated to enable safe access for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities.” So when a road is “incomplete,” it doesn’t mean the road ends abruptly at the edge of a cliff, it means that some of the road users were taken out of the planning equation. And for those people not considered, it may very well feel like they’re dangling from the edge of a cliff when they’re trying to cross the street with traffic zooming by at 45 mph with no pedestrian crossing.
This is exactly why the National Complete Streets Coalition was born and why it urges cities, counties, and states to adopt and implement Complete Streets policies. Making the streets safe and accessible to everyone has many more benefits to a community than the obvious. For example, study after study after study has shown that complete streets boost the local economy.
I recently attended a Complete Streets workshop that aimed to give guidance to those who are looking to adopt a Complete Streets policy. It featured a panel of local and state officials from the Washington D.C. region discussing their experiences implementing the policy.
Confession: I am not a planner or an engineer, so my knowledge on the procedures for implementing policy or infrastructure change is somewhat limited. You can imagine that I learned a few things from the workshop:
- Train staff so they can become familiar with the policy.
- Develop an implementation team to promote consistency on decision making throughout different divisions.
- Integrate “small tasks” with larger projects.
- Involve everyone in the process.
- Coordinate with other initiatives or programs.
- Balance the needs of the local community with that of the overall transportation system.
Despite all that I learned, I still walked away with a handful of unanswered questions that would be useful to those jurisdictions who have yet to adopt a Complete Streets policy (there are eight currently without one in the region):
- What kind of internal opposition was experienced when adopting the policy?
- How was the opposition handled?
- How are concerns from the public addressed?
- Is the public involved in the decision-making process for Complete Streets projects?
- Where does the funding come from?
- What were the biggest obstacles to adopting the policy?
- What are the difficulties that are experienced in implementing the policy?
I don’t doubt this conversation will continue, but I hope that in the future a workshop like the one I attended will highlight the trials and tribulations of implementing a Complete Streets policy instead of focusing on the successes.
We learn from our failures and will continue to do so. As the great Thomas Edison put it: “I can never find the thing that does the job best until I find the ones that don’t.”
Image by 2.bp.blogspot.com
This article was adapted from BikeArlington